Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
George

13-Why edit photos?

Recommended Posts

In the old days of film cameras, we either sent our rolls of film off to a lab or we did our own developing in the darkroom. Either way, there was a process involved in getting the images off the roll of film and onto prints. That process is called post processing. So, whether they like to admit it or not, film photographers all post processed their work.

In the digital age, we can learn to post process our own photos at home on our computers. The question is, why would we want to do this? To give you an idea, this first photo was how a sparrow looked straight out of my camera while the second has been post processed to bring out contrasts and colours.

sparrowbefore.jpg.677e31f23248448ddf1c8409e1090552.jpg

sparrowafter.jpg.fa0be06ac214fc76977e65547d2c883c.jpg

Is learning how to do post processing worth it? I think so! For your information, a digital camera is just a computer with very basic 'photoshop' photo editing software installed. The software is needed to convert your RAW files into jpgs. If you shoot jpg, you are relying on your camera and very basic software to post process your photos. As manufacturers want to keep everyone happy with the jpgs their cameras produce, the finished results are tailored to be rather flat and dull. I don't rely on my camera to do my post processing for me. I use an excellent computer and excellent software and I can do a much better job of post processing the RAW files my camera produces.

Another reason we might want to shoot RAW and edit our own photos is because camera sensors do not have as high a dynamic range as the human eye and simply can't get all the details into jpgs in high contrast situations. In this example, all the detail in the sky has been lost. The camera produced an absolutely awful finished photo because the software installed in my camera couldn't handle the high dynamic range and so the highlights are blown out and the photo is extremely flat and dull.

2058686619_beachbefore.jpg.bdbec62a14e8a151503b19e79e71dbe1.jpg

This is not an HDR. I produced this from the same RAW file as the photo above. If you shoot RAW and do your own post processing in a RAW photo editor you can bring details back into blown out highlights and blocked up shadows.

brorabeachafter.jpg.a686f4844339668855e0df0143fa0bc6.jpg

A picture paints a thousand words, so here are another two examples, Mrs Blackbird having a bath and Brora harbour. The first photo in each case is what the camera produced, and there's absolutely nothing wrong with them, they are just dull and flat, they have no vibrancy, no life about them. I opened the RAW files in my RAW Editor, adjusted the contrasts slightly, saved them as Tiffs, then opened them in two of my Photo Editing programmes to bring out contrasts and colour to give them some life. Took me about 2 minutes. Post processing isn't difficult these days because photo editing programmes are so good they can do all your post processing for you with a few preset clicks.

blackbirdbefore.jpg.df4099fba807bd432727e0afea8e0840.jpg

blackbirdafter.jpg.fe506284ff8f36ac3ca82f454100283e.jpg

harbourbefore.jpg.4f01cd1749a72c9fd54417c761fad174.jpg

harbourafter.jpg.7e47d203428886fbc0f7da9b00cc1bb2.jpg

Here is another example. Nothing wrong with the first photo, I guess, but it doesn't do anything for me. Not only did I bring out colours and contrasts with a few simple adjustments, I also used Photoshop to clean up the horrid dark smudgy line across the bottom of the image.

wavebefore.jpg.bbcfb0add6cf1f7c35c637aacf09355a.jpg

waveafter.jpg.43dd7d0bf9644a48fed91aacafc1c3be.jpg

Here is one of my photos brought into Photoshop Elements from Camera Raw, saved as a tiff, and then opened in one of my photo editing programmes. To bring out contrasts and adjustments like this in Photoshop can take hours and requires a PhD to know how to use the software. Photoshop plugins can do most of the hard work for you with a few simple clicks.

topazadjustAI.jpg.8621a81f90d7eba66fc6ad2b9e5c0d3b.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Being for pure beginners, this workshop is not a comprehensive photo editing guide, it is simply an introduction, an overview to the world of editing digital photographs. As such, we will only be looking at a few basics such as fixing up common problems and making simple adjustments.

When it comes to choosing a photo editor, there is a lot of software out there, and the choices can be bewildering. The good news is that photo editing is not graphic design and you do not need the full Photoshop. There are plenty of good apps out there that will do to get you started, including a few free ones. However, you will need to do your homework and perhaps ask a friend or two for advice on what would be best for you. Some like Lightroom, some like Capture One, some like Skylum, and there are many others including a whole range of free apps. For my RAW conversions and editing I use Photoshop Elements (PSE) and Topaz plugins, so these tutorials will reflect that. If you use other editors, the principles should be the same.

Regarding purchasing software, a word of caution is needed here which is best illustrated with a personal anecdote. Two years ago I had Photoshop Elements 15, and it did everything I needed. Then I bought a new camera, the Fuji XT3 and PSE15 wouldn't open the raw files. Adobe had changed their camera raw upgrade policy and older cameras were no longer supported with updates so I was forced to upgrade to PSE19. Six months later I bought the Fuji X-Pro3 and PSE19, which was only a few months old wouldn't open the raw files and I was forced to upgrade to PSE20. If you buy an older version of Photoshop Elements and you shoot RAW, make sure it supports your camera or you won't be able to edit your RAW flies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For many years I've endured comments from folks accusing photographers who edit their photos as not being true photographers. Real photographers, they tell you, get their photos right first time in camera. This used to be true in film photography when you really didn't want to waste time, money, and resources developing photos that were rubbish. In my experience, those who point accusatory fingers at those who post process their own digital photos are those who don't know how to do it themselves. True digital photographers don't rely on their cameras to do their post processing for them. How on earth could you capture the sun rising over Ben Klibreck like this if you don't post process your own photos?

allseeingeye-130811.jpg.c5dfbe7ba9fd28380deb7056993a8d74.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...